Mitchell v. Read
New York Supreme Court
APPEAL, by the plaintiff, from a judgment rendered at a special term, on a trial before the court without a jury, dismissing the complaint, without costs. The parties were copartners in the business of hotel keeping, in the city of ¡New York.
Read the full summary
APPEAL, by the plaintiff, from a judgment rendered at a special term, on a trial before the court without a jury, dismissing the complaint, without costs. The parties were copartners in the business of hotel keeping, in the city of ¡New York. The complaint alleged that during the existence of the copartnership the defendant had secretly taken, in his own name, renewal leases of the premises occupied by the firm, for a term to commence on the expiration of the copartnership and the leases under which the premises were held, which renewal leases he claimed to hold in his own right, and for his…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Geo. G. Barnard, J.
I think this case was properly disposed of at the special term.
It is unnecessary to add any suggestions to the opinion rendered at the trial, by the justice trying the cause.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Ingraham, P, J., and Geo, G. Barnard and Cardozo, Justices.]
2Cited by3 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. ScofieldNew York Supreme Court · 1885
- Crook v. CrookNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1887
- Weston v. KetchamThe Superior Court of New York City · 1875