Legal Opinion

Cefalo v. Board of Appeal of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 4, 1955PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

This is a bill in equity filed in the Superior Court by way of “appeal” under the zoning law of Boston, St. 1924, c. 488, § 19, as appearing in St. 1941, c. 373, § 18, from a decision of the board of appeal denying to the plaintiff a variance which would have permitted a “mortician’s home” in a single residence district.

The board found that the plaintiff “did not advance sufficient reasons to cause the Board to come to the conclusion that this was a specific case where a literal enforcement of the Act involved a substantial hardship upon the appellant, nor where desirable relief might be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pendergast v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  2. Prusik v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Real Properties, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Lambert v. Board of Appeals of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Gaunt v. Board of Appeals of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dion v. Board of Appeals of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  2. Davis v. Zoning Board of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Ferrante v. Board of Appeals of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. Johnson Products, Inc. v. City Council of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  5. Foster from Gloucester, Inc. v. City Council of GloucesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API