Cefalo v. Board of Appeal of Boston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.
This is a bill in equity filed in the Superior Court by way of “appeal” under the zoning law of Boston, St. 1924, c. 488, § 19, as appearing in St. 1941, c. 373, § 18, from a decision of the board of appeal denying to the plaintiff a variance which would have permitted a “mortician’s home” in a single residence district.
The board found that the plaintiff “did not advance sufficient reasons to cause the Board to come to the conclusion that this was a specific case where a literal enforcement of the Act involved a substantial hardship upon the appellant, nor where desirable relief might be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pendergast v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Prusik v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Real Properties, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Lambert v. Board of Appeals of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Gaunt v. Board of Appeals of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dion v. Board of Appeals of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Davis v. Zoning Board of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Ferrante v. Board of Appeals of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Johnson Products, Inc. v. City Council of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Foster from Gloucester, Inc. v. City Council of GloucesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.