Legal Opinion

Ertegun v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 9, 1976No. Nos. 553, 756, 757, Dockets 75-4193, 75-4194, 75-4195PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Until December 1, 1967, Atlantic Records Sales Company, Inc. was a closely-held corporation, qualifying for and electing to receive the special tax treatment of Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code. 26 U.S.C. § 1371 et seq. The appellants are the former shareholders of Atlantic who, pursuant to the provisions of Subchapter S, included Atlantic’s undistributed taxable income in their own gross (and therefore taxable) incomes on a pro rata basis. 26 U.S.C. § 1373.

This appeal arises from a disagreement between the appellant-shareholders and the Internal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Central Cuba Sugar Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Central Cuba Sugar CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Pittsburgh Milk Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  4. Scott Krauss News Agency, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  5. J. J. Little & Ives Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ahmet Ertegun and Ioana Ertegun v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Gerald Wexler and Shirley Wexler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Nesuhi Ertegun and Belkis Ertegun v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API