Boxwell v. Champagne
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
Two suits, styled L. G. Boxwell, et al., d. b. a. Louisiana Metal Culvert Company, were instituted in the County Court of Hinds County against Edwin C. Champagne and Albert Switzer. One sought to recover on a demand note, dated September 19, 1950, in the sum of $2,000, without interest,' and the other on a like note, dated October 3,1950, in the sum of $1,000.
The answer of Champagne set up in effect that he and Joel F. Fisher, Jr., executed the notes, which were endorsed by Switzer, to H. H. Manner, and that Manner thereafter, without his knowledge or consent, materially altered and changed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Equitable Life Assurance Society v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
- Alford v. DelatteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Upton v. BushMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
- Holmes v. FordMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Turner v. TerryMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Koval v. KovalMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Hults v. TillmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Snellbaker v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Carmichael v. Agur Realty Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.