Philadelphia to Use of MacK Paving & Construction Co. v. Heyer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
This is an action of scire facias sur municipal claim for paving. The court below entered judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, and the defendant appeals. The defendant, by his affidavit, attempted to set up two grounds of defense: (1) that the work for which the assessment was made was not the original paving of the street, but a repaving of what had long been a city street, and (2) that the property was rural in character, and, therefore, not subject to assessment by the foot-front rule, which had been applied in this proceeding.
The affidavit asserted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Philadelphia ex rel. Mack v. EddlemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Philadelphia v. HaferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- McKeesport v. SolesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Harrisburg v. FunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Philadelphia v. DibelerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Petition of SulewskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Borough of Montoursville v. EckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- City of Johnstown v. HowarthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928