Legal Opinion
Vaughan v. Canik
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1934No. 1274PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EJjLIOTT, Judge.
Uri Vaughan 'brought a suit against Paul Canik and ~L. O. Miller, claiming of them an alleged balance on two promissory notes signed by them. This suit bears the No. 756 on the docket of the district court, parish of Cameron, in which parish the suit was filed.
One of the notes is for $300, bears the date, January 22, 1921, and carries on its back alleged payments of interest amounting to $121. This note is payable six months after date to the order of Frederick Vaughan, and draws interest at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum from maturity until paid, and together with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Serio v. TrainorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Viley v. WallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- McKee v. GodwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Starns v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Producing Man. Co., Inc. v. Broadway Theater LeagueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Huderston v. American Mut. Liability Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1943