Legal Opinion

University of Utah v. Salt Lake County

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1976No. 14190PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff, University of Utah, sought a ruling that certain equipment it had leased from Picker X-Ray Company is exempt from being taxed by defendant, Salt Lake County. Its argument is that because it obtained this property under a five-year lease, with an option to purchase, coupled with the facts that it has the possession and use of the property, and that it has agreed to pay the taxes thereon, such leased property should be considered property of the University. From a summary judgment rejecting plaintiff’s contention it appeals.

The lease provided that the equipment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell Aero, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Thiokol Chemical Corporation v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Hoover Equipment Co. v. Board of Tax Roll Corrections of Adair CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. City of Tempe v. Del E. Webb CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kunes v. Samaritan Health ServiceArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Interwest Aviation v. County Board of EqualizationUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Board of Equalization v. First Security Leasing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. ITEL Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Salt Lake County ex rel. Board of Equalization of Salt Lake County v. Tax Commission of the State of Utah Ex Rel. Utah Transit AuthorityUtah Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API