In re Freed Bros. Style Coat House, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
The petition to review is dismissed.
I. Assuming, but not deciding, that under General Order XXVII the petitioner had a right to bring this petition to an interlocutory order of a referee, the relief sought should not be granted, for I am asked to set aside a discretionary order made by the referee in which he refused to grant a continuance in a turnover proceeding sought on the ground of the pendency of an indictment against the respondents in that proceeding.
The referee’s order was purely discretionary, and there was not any abuse of discretion shown. Cf. Goldsby v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Isaacs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Matter of HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- In re Rosenfeld-Goldman Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1915
- In re HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.