Legal Opinion

French v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 30, 1964No. A-13421PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

Counsel for the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, sets forth fourteen separate assignments of error in his petition in error. However, he states in his brief that he will only urge two of these assignments:

“(1) The trial court erred in overruling the motion of the defendant for a trial on the issue of insanity before the issue of the crime was tried.
*911“(2) Error of the court in giving oral instructions to the jury after the case had been submitted.”

The Court would first like to commend both counsel for the very excellent briefs in this case.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Berwick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Denton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Shaffer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Brookshire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Koonce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Gamble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Fields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API