Legal Opinion

Sizemore v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1979No. 1-1277A287PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Defendants-appellants Jeffrey Allen Sandlin (Sandlin) and Michael Ray Size-more (Sizemore) were charged separately with the rape 1 of K.C. (prosecutrix) and both were found guilty of rape in a joint trial.

The evidence most favorable to the State of Indiana (State) discloses the following sequence of events. On August 3, 1976, at approximately 9:00 P.M., the prosecutrix and her older sister Cheryl were waiting (to no avail) at Shazam’s on the south side of Indianapolis for their boyfriends. Size-more, Sandlin, and Sandlin’s older brother Jack spotted the girls standing by…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Maldonado v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gaddis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Ballard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Pawloski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sizemore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Coburn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Skaggs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Crowder v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. McCormick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API