Legal Opinion

Reinhart v. Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 13, 1989No. 88-1459, 88-1460PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

548 So.2d 1176 (1989)

Harry R. REINHART, Appellant,

v.

Arthur C. MILLER, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 88-1459, 88-1460.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 13, 1989.

Michael J. McNerney and Amy R. Reeck, of Brinkley, McNerney, Morgan & Solomon, Fort Lauderdale, for Reinhart.

Jay M. Levy, of Hershoff, Levy & Swartz, P.A., Miami, for Miller.

GARRETT, Judge.

Appellant appeals the trial court's order determining appellees' entitlement to attorney fees. The same order found appellant to be entitled to attorney fees which appellees cross appeal, after consolidation.

Although the jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Folta v. BoltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Katz v. Van Der NoordSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. Publix Super Markets v. Cheesbro RoofingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Moritz v. Hoyt Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Anglia Jacs & Co., Inc. v. DubinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Green v. Kendall Racquetball InvestmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Herbert H. Davis v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Lucite Center, Inc. v. MercedeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API