Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wilson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1893No. 62PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application for Writ of Error' to the Court of Civil Appeals, Second District, in an appeal from the District Court of Grayson County. The judgment below was affirmed, and the Texas & Pacific Railway Company,' the appellant, filed application for writ of error. The application was held deficient in not having in the accompanying-transcript a certified copy of the conclusions of fact found by the Court of Civil Appeals.

Read the full summary

Application for Writ of Error' to the Court of Civil Appeals, Second District, in an appeal from the District Court of Grayson County. The judgment below was affirmed, and the Texas & Pacific Railway Company,' the appellant, filed application for writ of error. The application was held deficient in not having in the accompanying-transcript a certified copy of the conclusions of fact found by the Court of Civil Appeals. The applicant was given ten days in which to furnish the necessary copy. A perfected transcript was filed within the extension. The opinion sufficiently shows the application…

1Opinion of the Court

The law requires application for writs of error to be accompanied by certified copy of conclusions of law and fact filed in the cause by the Court of Civil Appeals; but in this case, except as to one finding; that court adopted the findings of fact made by the trial court.

The only finding found in the transcript accompanying the application is the one made by the Court of Civil Appeals, and thus we are not furnished with such information as is necessary to enable us to know whether the rulings of that court are correct in reference to the matters on which the application is based.

When some or…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hodo v. Mexican National Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API