Legal Opinion
Delaney v. Automated Bread Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 8, 1985PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*678The penalty of striking a pleading for failure to comply with an order of disclosure (CPLR 3126 [3]) is an extreme one which is warranted only where the failure has been willful or contumacious (Bassett v Bando Sangsa Co., 103 AD2d 728; Oppenheim & Macnow v Worth, 103 AD2d 687; Joseph v Roller Castle, 100 AD2d 839; Battaglia v Hofmeister, 100 AD2d 833; cf. Baumann v Dee, 100 AD2d 504). Under the facts and circumstances of this . case, we conclude that defendant should be granted one final opportunity to comply with the discovery order within the time we have prescribed (Joseph v Roller…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bassett v. Bando Sangsa Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Battaglia v. HofmeisterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Baumann v. DeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Joseph v. Roller Castle, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Oppenheim & Macnow, P. C. v. WorthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by14 opinions
- Miller v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Gaylord Bros. v. RND Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Preston v. PrestonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Stathoudakes v. Kelmar Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Rubin v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.