Countryman v. Henderson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HAIRE, Chief Judge,
Division 1.
In this special action in the nature of mandamus we were asked to order the trial court to appoint petitioner Vern Countryman as guardian of the persons of Henry F. Whitman and Nona Whitman, respondents. We have heretofore entered our ’Order granting the relief requested, and this opinion sets forth the reasons therefor.
There is no dispute concerning the pertinent facts. After an appropriate hearing the trial court found that the respondents Whitman were incompent and that guardians of their estates and persons should be .appointed. The trial court then appointed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Guardianship of LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Guardianship of BoutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Ricci v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rasmussen by Mitchell v. FlemingArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Mack v. MackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Rainey v. Guardianship of MacKeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Kelly v. EllistonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- MacK v. MacKCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.