State v. Totten
North Dakota Supreme Court
Original application for prohibition and injunction against the State Board of Administration by the Attorney General, and the Superintendent of Public Instruction.
1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.
This is an original application to this court to compel the board of administration and the educational commission to refrain from preparing and prescribing the courses of study for the common schools of the state. The respondents filed a return setting up that the board of administration possessed the authority so to prepare courses of study pursuant to, the provisions of Senate Bill No. 134, enacted by the legislative assembly of 1919, and of the authority of the educational commission to proceed so to do under the direction of the board of administration. The relators contend that such act…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Ex parte CorlissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Erickson v. BurrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Langer v. KositzkyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Murray Bros. v. ButtlesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ShaverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Powers v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Ophaug v. HildreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Kerry and Clara Powers, on behalf of themselves and the citizens of Wyoming and Cindy Hill, on behalf of herself and as the Superintendent of Public Instruction v. State of Wyoming and Matthew H. Mead, Governor, in his official capacityWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Powers v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.