Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Vance

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1890No. 13569PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

— This is an appeal from a judgment entered against the defendant on the pleadings, and the case is brought here on the judgment roll. The action is ejectment. The complaint alleges that on the ninth day of October, 1888, the plaintiff was the owner and in possession of the northwest quarter, the north half of the southwest quarter, and the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section 31, in township 3 north, range 9 east, Mount Diablo base and meridian; and that, on the day named, the defendant entered and ousted the plaintiff from the said land, and has ever since…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caperton v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Huston v. Twin & City Creek Turn Pike Road Co.California Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Hartman v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Wheeler v. HurleyNevada Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API