Johnson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING
On May 8, 1984, this court unanimously affirmed this cause without opinion. 453 So.2d 8.
Because counsel has filed a request for a statement pursuant to Rule 39 (k) and Rule 40 ARAP, this court sets forth the following as its opinion.
Charlie Johnson was charged in a two count indictment with the unlawful sale of Diazepan, a controlled substance, in violation of the Alabama Uniform Controlled Substances Act of 1971. Following a jury trial, the appellant was found "guilty as charged". A sentencing hearing was conducted and no prior felonies were found, but the appellant was sentenced…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- Qualls v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Lightfoot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985