Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 12, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING

On May 8, 1984, this court unanimously affirmed this cause without opinion. 453 So.2d 8.

Because counsel has filed a request for a statement pursuant to Rule 39 (k) and Rule 40 ARAP, this court sets forth the following as its opinion.

Charlie Johnson was charged in a two count indictment with the unlawful sale of Diazepan, a controlled substance, in violation of the Alabama Uniform Controlled Substances Act of 1971. Following a jury trial, the appellant was found "guilty as charged". A sentencing hearing was conducted and no prior felonies were found, but the appellant was sentenced…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Qualls v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Lightfoot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  3. Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API