Legal Opinion

People v. Everett

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1909No. Crim. No. 81PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment' of the Superior Court of Calaveras County, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. A. I. McSorley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Solinsky & Wehe, John Hancock, and Snyder & Snyder, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The information upon which a verdict was rendered of “guilty as charged” is as follows: “L. Everett is accused by the district attorney of the said county by this information of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape, a felony, committed as follows: The said L. Everett on or about the twenty-fourth day of July, one thousand, nine hundred and seven, at the said county of Calaveras, and before the filing of this information, did then and there willfully, unlawfully, feloniously, violently and forcibly make an assault upon one Edna Leavitt, a female, with the intent then and there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. People v. MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The People v. BonfantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. People v. TrumbleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Pueblo v. CortésSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1916
  4. State v. GarneyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Pueblo v. García IthierSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API