Stephen L. Bartlett Co. v. Arbuckle Bros.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Patent-Office in a trade-mark opposition proceeding, reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, and sustaining the opposition to the registration by appellant,.applicant below, of the word “Havesome”' as a trade-mark on cocoa. Shoi-tly before applicant adopted this mark, the opposer, appellee here, adopted the word “Drinksum” as a trademark for coffee.
It has been held that cocoa and coffee are goods of the same descriptive properties, within the meaning of the Trade-Mark Act (Comp. St. § 9485 et seq.). Baker Co., Limited, v.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Solventol Chemical Products, Inc. v. LangfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Ostermoor & Co. v. Rose Spring & Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
- Hillyard Chemical Co. v. Vestal Laboratories, Inc. Vestal Laboratories, Inc. v. Hillyard Chemical CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Vacuum Oil Co. v. Gargoyle Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923