Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Security Mutual Life Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMauck, J.

Gillespie brought bis action in tbe Common Pleas upon a matured endowment life insurance policy issued to him by tbe defendant in 1902. The policy was for $1,000. The plaintiff claimed that he was entitled to the face of the policy, plus $523 surplus, subject to a loan previously made him of $925.53, and that the net amount owing him at the maturity of the policy was $597.47. The defendant at the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony tendered judgment for $161.06, on the theory that the plaintiff was entitled to a surplus above the face of the policy of $86.58, instead of the $523 claimed by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Forman v. Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Maddox v. Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neal Ayers v. Bernard Kidney and American Employers' Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  2. Portaro v. American Guarantee and Liability Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962
  3. Karras v. Nationwide Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Young v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API