Legal Opinion

Froslid v. Hults

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Tessler, J.

This is a proceeding brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules for an order to review the determination of the respondent, Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York. However, the relief sought by the petitioner is in the nature of mandamus. He seeks an order directing the respondent to permit the petitioner and others similarly situated to obliterate or cover over the legend “ New York World’s Pair 1964/65” on the metal license plates to be issued to him for the year 1964 and to restrain the respondent from causing to be used for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ellsworth, Barrows & Co. v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. People v. MacWilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Froslid v. HultsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API