Legal Opinion

Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. Ivy

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 1, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrown Over, J.

This was a suit for rescission of an insurance contract and for the recovery of $3,750 which had already been paid under the policy.

The original and amended bills alleged three grounds for cancellation and recovery, to-wit: (1) Failure to disclose, in answer to question No. 11 of the application for insurance, that insured had been paid indemnity for a previous accident by two insurance companies other than the one stated in answer to said question; (2) failure to disclose, in answer to question 12, that said three insurance policies of defendant had been cancelled; (3) the disability of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Fetter v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Life & Casualty Ins. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Continental Fire Insurance v. WhitakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Kister v. Lebanon Mutual Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. LawrenceTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Williams v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. GangTennessee Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API