Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brandt v. Leon Plastics, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1992No. S-91-399Published

1DissentWhite, J.

It is well established that a workers’ compensation claimant complaining of a subjective injury or disability cannot recover on the basis of nonmedical evidence alone. See, Fees v. Rivett Lumber Co., 228 Neb. 617, 423 N.W.2d 483 (1988); Coco v. Austin Co., 212 Neb. 95, 321 N.W.2d 448 (1982); Mack v. Dale Electronics, Inc., 209 Neb. 367, 307 N.W.2d 814 (1981). In Eiting v. Godding, 191 Neb. 88, 91-92, 214 N.W.2d 241, 244 *522(1974), we explained the rationale for this rule:

Where the claimed injuries are of such a character as to require skilled and professional persons to determine the cause and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. Walters & Heiliger Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ross v. Sayers Well Servicing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Sondag v. Ferris HardwareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Travelers Ins. Co. v. BlazierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Fees v. Rivett Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API