Application of Cesare Reni
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the Patent Office Board of Appeals decision affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4 of appellant’s application 1 as unpatentable over Joris 2 in view of Shepard 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. In his brief, appellant has withdrawn the appeal as to claims 1-3, leaving claim 4 the only remaining claim on appeal.
THE INVENTION
The invention can be no more succinctly stated than as in claim 4:
4. Method of producing phenol and acetone by acid decomposition of cu-mene hydroperoxide, comprising gradually and simultaneously adding (a) an aqueous hydrochloric acid at…
2Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- In Re Klaus HeckCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Nelson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- For Your Ease Only, Inc. v. Natural Science Industries, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.