Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Dist. v. Afscme Council 4, No. Cv92-0703202s (Apr. 23, 1993)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 23, 1993No. CV92-0703202SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON APPLICATION TO VACATE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD On January 1, 1988, the plaintiff, Metropolitan District Commission ("MDC"), and the defendant, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 4, Local 184 ("AFSCME"), entered into a written collective bargaining agreement, providing for arbitration in the event the parties were unable to resolve any dispute.

Subsequently, the parties were unable to resolve a dispute and agreed to submit the matter to the expedited arbitration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 287Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Esaw v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Cohen v. Security Title & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Board of Education of Waterbury v. Waterbury Teachers Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Greater Bridgeport Transit District v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1336Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API