Legal Opinion

Muller Boat Works, Inc. v. Unnamed 52' House Barge

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 6, 2006No. 05-CV-04531 (KAM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & OPINION

MATSUMOTO, United States Magistrate Judge.

The parties in this case consented to a trial before the undersigned, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (see doc. no. 3), and a bench trial was conducted on February 8- 9, 2006. 1 After reviewing the submissions of the parties and having assessed the credibility of the witnesses, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff is awarded $17,127.40 in damages, and defendants are awarded $72,056.79 in…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Quiles v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Colonna's Shipyard, Inc. v. CITY OF KEY WEST, FLA.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. the Tug M/V Scott TurecamoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  4. National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. v. Rick's Marine Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API