Legal Opinion
Hildebrand v. Petro (In Re Petro)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 17, 2008No. BAP 08-8009PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHEA-STONUM, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Chapter 13 Trustee appeals an order of the bankruptcy court confirming the Debtors’ Chapter 13 plan over the Trustee’s objection that the Debtors were not contributing all of their projected disposable income to the payment of their unsecured creditors. For the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the decision of the bankruptcy court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I.ISSUES ON APPEAL
Whether the bankruptcy court erred in its interpretation of § 1325(b)(1)(B) when it determined that, for an above-median income debtor,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hamilton v. Lanning (In Re Lanning)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Nowlin v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Deborah Seafort v. Beverly BurdenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- In Re TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Burden v. Seafort (In Re Seafort)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.