In Re Supplementary Proceedings for the Collection of a Tax From L. Adler Bros. & Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 28,1902, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of the appellant herein in supplementary proceedings.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 28,1902, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of the appellant herein in supplementary proceedings. This proceeding for the collection of a county tax levied for the year 1900 on the personal property of L. Adler Brothers and Company was commenced June 7, 1902, by the service of an order directing the treasurer of the corporation to appear before a referee to be examined concerning its property. The…
1Opinion of the Court
Parker, Oh. J.
The board of supervisors of the county of Monroe, in the year 1900, levied upon the property of L. Adler Brothers and Company, a corporation, a tax amounting to $446.28. The appellant corporation has urged that the tax was not duly levied, but we agree with the argument and determination of the Appellate Division that this contention is not well founded, and rest our conclusion that the tax was duly levied upon the opinion of that court.
Upon this review the appellant strongly urges further that the warrant issued by the county treasurer for the collection of the tax was void,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. . HagadornNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- City of Rochester v. BlossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Clark v. HallockNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- In Re Supplementary Proceedings for the Collection of a Tax of VeithNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Stroud v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1854
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Donovan v. City of OswegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Brown v. OtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Sheldon v. SheldonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- People ex rel. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co. v. CarmichaelNew York Supreme Court · 1909
- Lancaster Sea Beach Improvement Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.