Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1995No. 9225SC154PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

We note initially that the denial of a motion to dismiss is ordinarily not immediately appealable. Faulkenbury v. Retirement System, 108 N.C. App. 357, 365, 424 S.E.2d 420, 423, aff’d, 335 N.C. 158, 436 S.E.2d 821 (1993). Here, defendants asserted the defenses of absolute and qualified immunity to most of plaintiff’s claims. This Court has previously held that the doctrine of sovereign immunity presents a personal jurisdiction question and that the denial of a motion to dismiss on that basis is immediately appealable. See Faulkenbury at 357, 424 S.E.2d at 423; Zimmer v. North…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hensley Ex Rel. North Carolina v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. Toomer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Price v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Houpe v. City of StatesvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Wells v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API