Legal Opinion

Saska v. Metropolitan Museum of Art

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2016No. 2016 NYSlipOp 51628(U)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filip Saska, TOMÁ NADRCHAL, and STEPHEN MICHELMAN, Plaintiffs,

against

The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Defendant.

Theodore Grunewald and PATRICIA NICHOLSON, Plaintiffs,

against

The Metropolitan Museum of Art, THOMAS P. CAMPBELL (DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER), EMILY RAFFERTY (PRESIDENT), and DANIEL BRODSKY (CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, OF THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART), Defendants.

650775/2013

Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP, for the Saska Plaintiffs.

Hiller, PC, for the Grunewald Plaintiffs.

Arnold & Porter LLP, for defendants.

Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.

Motion sequence numbers 002…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Cron v. Hargro Fabrics, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API