Legal Opinion

Vest v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 11, 2003No. CR 03-1300Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, Kelly Vest, by and through his attorney, Stuart Vess, has filed a motion to file a belated appeal, which we will treat as a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney accepts responsibility for the untimeliness in filing the record and states in his motion that the lateness was due to a mistake on his part. We find that such error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam); Jacks v. State, 344 Ark. 406, 39 S.W.3d 798 (2001).

Appellant’s motion is granted. A…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jacks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API