Legal Opinion

Harper v. Welchem, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1990No. B14-89-00959-CVPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

Appellant, a partnership, appeals from an adverse judgment entered against it in a breach of contract action. In three points of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred in holding that appellant’s status as an agent of a disclosed principal precluded it from bringing the action, that Idaho law was determinative instead of Texas law, and that appellant lacked the requisite Interstate Commerce Commission authority to perform a trucking contract. We do not address the merits of these points raised by appellant because we find that the trial court has not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Wagner v. WarnaschTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. McCauley v. Consolidated UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Lone Star Cement Corporation v. FairTexas Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. America Online, Inc. v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. Martin v. DOSHOS I, LTD., INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  3. Disco MacHine of Liberal Co. v. Payton, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  4. Mindis Metals, Inc. v. Oilfield Motor & Control, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. Lipshy Motorcars, Inc. v. Sovereign Associates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API