Legal Opinion

United Technologies Corp. v. Groppo

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 6, 1994No. 12604PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

This appeal comes to us on a reservation of legal issues pursuant to General Statutes § 52-2351 and Practice Book § 4147.2 The stipulation of the parties3 presents two questions for the advice of this court: “1. Is the purchase pursuant to a cost-reimbursement type contract between the plaintiffs and the United States government, where title to the goods passes to the United States government prior to the *74use of the property, exempt from sales and use tax? 2. Is the purchase of services which are otherwise enumerated under General Statutes § 12-407 (2) (i), in order to fulfill, or in support…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. ScurlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Gianetti v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Console v. NickouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Capel v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Nerac, Inc. v. MeehanConnecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API