Legal Opinion

Machado v. Mitamura

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1918No. 1057PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Exceptions From Circuit Court, First Circuit. Hon. S. B. Kemp, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

QUARLES, J.

The plaintiff, a woman of twenty, commenced this action against the defendant, a regular practicing physician, to recover damages claiined to have heen sustained by plaintiff by reason of the negligence of the defendant in treating her in a case of childbirth. The trial in the circuit court resulted in a verdict for $1,000 in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant then moved for a new trial upon a number of grounds, the first being that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a nonsuit, the second, third, fourth, *225fifth and sixth grounds being alleged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County of Hawaii v. PurdyHawaii Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pooler v. Stewarts' Pharmacies, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Leong Sam v. KeliihoomaluHawaii Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API