Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1981No. C-80-743PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

In Tulsa County cases no. CRF-80-2436 and 2493, the petitioner pled guilty to two charges of Uttering a Forged Instrument. Judge Margaret Lamm accepted the pleas and passed the matter for pre-sentence investigation. The record indicates that the State and the trial judge were both agreeable to imposing suspended sentences, pending the outcome of the pre-sentence investigation report. In that report, the probation officer recommended probation. However, at the sentencing hearing, the State changed its position on suspending the sentence, and the judge…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Chatman v. PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Jump v. PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rhino Fund, LLLP v. HutchinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Forman v. BrownColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Wofford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API