Legal Opinion

Foster v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner-respondent Arthur Foster was released on parole from the Attica Correctional Facility in early 1974. On December 30, 1975 he was returned to the facility as a parole violator with seven months and two days remaining to serve on his maximum term. He appeared before the parole board and was ordered held until his maximum expiration date. The State, relying on subdivision 5 of section 803 of the Correction Law which provides that a parole violator returned with less than one year remaining on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Metropolis Theater Company, Plffs. In Err. v. City of Chicago and Ernest J. MagerstadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Van Berkel v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. A. E. Nettleton Co. v. DiamondNew York Court of Appeals · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. McNeil v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API