Legal Opinion

Sturgeon Bay Harbor Co. v. Leatham

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Magruder

This is an action of assumpsit, begun by the appellant, the Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Canal and Harbor Company, against the appellees to recover a certain amount, claimed to be due to appellant for tolls charged to the appellees for the use of said canal in the running over and passing through its waters of certain propellers, schooners, barges and tugs owned by the appellees. The declaration originally contained only the common counts, but it was subsequently amended by the addition of three special counts. The pleas were general issue, nul tiel corporation, and the Statute of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Perrine v. Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1850

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. County of Du Page v. Illinois Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. TousignantIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Russell v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. SwanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API