Legal Opinion
Pettus v. Casey
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided June 11, 1962No. 48739PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STORCKMAN, Judge.
The plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment of $25,000 for personal injuries alleged to have been received as the result of a collision of motor vehicles. The defendant’s motion for new trial was sustained and the plaintiff appealed.
In ruling the motion for new trial, the trial court failed to specify of record the grounds upon which the new trial was granted. S.Ct.Rule 83.06(b), V.A.M.R. Nevertheless, the appellant did not serve on the respondent the statement provided by the rule which would have required the respondent to file the first brief and to assume from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eickmann v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. UllmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Roush v. Alkire Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Houfburg v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co. of MaineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Sconce v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Black v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Doe v. Alpha Therapeutic Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. AshleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Williams v. Board of Education, Cass R-VIII School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Thompson v. Curators of the University of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.