Hum v. Pinner
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
Arthur and Elizabeth Pinner own all the capital stock in Santa Cruz, Inc. The main asset of the corporation is a 1,240-acre ranch located near Maraña, Arizona. The Watsons leased the ranch from the corporation. Their lease gave them the right to renewal and also a right of first refusal on any sale of the ranch.
The Hums entered into a contract with the Pinners (stockholders) to buy all their stock in the corporation. Their agreement contained, inter alia, the following provisions:
ARTICLE II
“K. That if title to the real property in Exhibit B be unmarketable at the time of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wittick v. MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Pima Farms Co. v. FowlerArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Moore v. Sterling Warner Industrial Investment Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Ace Realty, Inc. v. LooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Yost Farm Company v. CremerMontana Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.