Legal Opinion

Claim of Lamia v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 27, 1983, which ruled that claimant did not voluntarily remove himself from the labor market and awarded him benefits for a continuing causally related injury. H Claimant, a 62-year-old painter employed by the self-insured employer, injured his back in a work-related accident on November 9,1979. Full benefits were awarded for the period November 10,1979 to November 26,1979 and February 11, 1980 to March 7, 1980. At a December 15, 1980 hearing, claimant testified that he returned to light duty on May 15, 1980 but had to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hyers v. Wells Fuel Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. In re the Claim of Hickey v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Camarda v. New York TelephoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Brown v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  3. Landi v. Carrier Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Claim of Crosby v. SCM Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API