Legal Opinion

Lemar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 14, 1999No. 98-03592PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLUE, Judge.

Michael Anthony Lemar argues, and the State concedes, that the written sentence does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. Lemar entered a plea to, among other crimes, aggravated assault with a weapon, not with a firearm. Accordingly, we reverse the three-year minimum mandatory term that was not orally pronounced at sentencing. See Kendrick v. State, 591 So.2d 671 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). On remand, the trial court shall strike the minimum mandatory term and shall correct the judgment to reflect a conviction for aggravated assault with a weapon, not with a firearm.

Lemar…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Kendrick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API