Legal Opinion

McDerment v. Browning

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided September 21, 1998No. CIV.A. 2:97-0484PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

At the outset, the Court notes the expansive gulf separating the parties’ respective accounts of what occurred on the night in question. Defendants paint Plaintiff Randall L. McDerment as an unruly, intoxicated and lawless suspect with a history of violent behavior who attempted to evade them and then resisted mightily his capture. McDerment and others suggest he was minding his business, traveling on his own…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Thompson Everett, Inc. v. National Cable Advertising, L.P. Cable Networks, Inc. Cable Media CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neiswonger v. HennesseyDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2000
  2. Krider v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API