Legal Opinion

MIGLIACCIO v. ALLY BANK

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 24, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00307Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE PAUL MIGLIACCIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:24-cv-00307-SDN ) ALLY BANK, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Maine regulations require car dealers to advertise the full price of the vehicle, including any extra charges the dealer might impose. 26-239 C.M.R. ch. 104 §§ 5(B), 1(D). Paul Migliaccio bought a car from a dealer who nonetheless tacked on a so-called “junk fee”—in this case, a “document fee”—without including the fee in the advertised price. So Mr. Migliaccio sued on behalf of himself and a putative class of car buyers who allegedly paid similar junk…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2022
  5. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API