Broussard v. Hilcorp Energy Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.*
_JjWe granted this writ application to determine whether La. R.S. 31:136 applies to the plaintiffs’ claims, thus requiring plaintiffs to provide defendants with pre-suit notice and an opportunity to perform prior to filing suit. For the following reasons, we affirm the court of appeal, and hold that La. R.S. 31:136 is inapplicable to the plaintiffs’ claims.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs, Kern Broussard and Nettie Ann Dubois Broussard, own certain real *815property in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana, on which mineral, surface, and subsurface |2leases were granted to various…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holly & Smith v. St. Helena Cong. FacilitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Thibodeaux v. DonnellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
- Green v. Louisiana Underwriters Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- TERREBONNE SCHOOL BD. v. Castex EnergySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- In Matter of American Waste and Pollution Control Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- State v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- City of Bossier City v. VernonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Catahoula Parish School Board v. Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLCSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- FIA Card Services, N.A. v. WeaverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.