Legal Opinion

Wistuk v. Lower Mt. Bethel Township Zoning Hearing Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 2007No. 79 MAP 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

The initial question presented is whether a landowner’s acquiescence to the conduct of a meeting of a zoning hearing board to entertain written briefs, deliberate, and render a decision constituted a waiver of the statutory entitlement to a deemed approval of a special exception and variance, where the Board did not issue a written decision within forty-five days after the close of the evidentiary record. We also consider whether such a meeting constitutes a hearing for purposes of the forty-five-day requirement.

Pertinent to this question, Section 908(9) of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gaster v. Township of Nether ProvidenceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Parsowith v. Com., Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Hogan, Lepore & Hogan v. Pequea Township Zoning BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Quality Food Markets, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. South Lebanon Township Zoning Hearing Board v. WeberCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API