Legal Opinion

People v. Hendrix

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Albert Tomei, J.

The defendant Kayson Pearson has issued a subpoena to American Broadcasting Companies Inc. (ABC) for certain outtakes1 of a TV show regarding the instant crimes. The outtakes are alleged to contain statements of four witnesses that will be called by the government on their direct case. ABC has moved to quash the subpoena.

The defendant Troy Hendrix has issued a subpoena to David Schisgall, Swinging T. Productions (STP), for all materials written or recorded of any interview with the complainant SB.2 STP has moved to quash the subpoena.

After oral argument,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HendrixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. DiazNew York Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API