Legal Opinion

Gillis v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 21, 1919No. 296PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. The case is stated in thé opinion..

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

Action under the Employers’ Liability statute, 35 Stat. 65. Plaintiff in error’s intestate, on November 3, 1912, while in! the railroad company’s service in interstate commerce, was killed, through the negligence, in whole or in part, it is charged, of one of the company’s officers, agents or employees.

The defenses of the company were denialof the declaration and averments that the intestate’s injuries and death were due to and caused by his own negligence and besides “were the result of acts, conditions and circumstances the happening of which was assumed” by him.

The case was tried to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. WhitacreSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  2. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. McNamara v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API