Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bacon v. Town of Enfield

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 30, 2004No. 2002-591Published

1Dissent

NADEAU, J.,

with whom

BROCK, C.J., retired, specially assigned under RSA 490:3, joins, dissenting.

We dissent because we disagree with Chief

Justice Broderick’s conclusion that Bacon’s use violates the spirit of the ordinance, and because we believe that the special concurrence has misinterpreted the unnecessary hardship test.

Although the trial court found that granting Bacon’s variance “would have some effect on the public rights of others in that it increases congestion along the shoreline and reduces minimally the filtration of runoff into the lake,” we disagree that these findings, without…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tsiatsios v. TsiatsiosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Simplex Technologies, Inc. v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. Grey Rocks Land Trust v. Town of HebronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. Associated Home Utilities, Inc. v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  5. Rancourt v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API