Legal Opinion
Mahopac Central School District v. Piazza Bros.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 9, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (O’Rourke, J.), dated December 17, 2004, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
On June 25, 2001 the respondent Piazza Brothers, Inc. (hereinafter Piazza), entered into a written contract with the petitioner Mahopac Central School District (hereinafter Mahopac), to perform general construction work at a public improvement project known as Mahopac High School Addition *700and Renovation. Thereafter, a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henry Boeckmann, Jr. & Associates, Inc. v. Board of Education, Hempstead Union Free School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Helmer-Cronin Construction, Inc. v. Beacon Community Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Spoleta Construction and Development Corp. v. Board of Education of the Byron-Bergen Central School DistricAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- D.J.H. Mechanical Associates, Ltd. v. Mahopac Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zurich American Insurance v. Ramapo Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Clemens Realty, LLC v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Hawthorne Cedar Knolls Union Free School District v. Carey & Walsh, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007