Legal Opinion

Gainesville Radiology Group v. Hummel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1993No. S92G1401PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case, Hummel v. Gainesville Radiology Group, P.C., 205 Ga. App. 157 (421 SE2d 333) (1992), to consider: “Whether the [opinion of the] Court of Appeals undermines the discretion of trial judges in matters of juror conduct and creates conflicting precedents.” We conclude that it does and reverse the Court of Appeals.

Appellee, Hummel, brought a medical malpractice action against the appellants, James C. Strittmatter, M.D. and Gainesville Radiology Group, P.C., a professional corporation by whom Dr. Strittmatter was employed (hereinafter Gainesville…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Isaacs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Fidelity National Bank v. KnellerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Glover v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ellington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Gardiner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Hargett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. Stiles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API